State of Maharashtra throu Alibag Police Station vs Mahendra Dattatreya Late — 87/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 75,76,78,79. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG010012802025
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
416/2025
Filing Date
14-11-2025
Registration No
87/2025
Registration Date
14-11-2025
Court
District and Session Court Raigad
Judge
15-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
FIR Details
FIR Number
194
Police Station
Alibag Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra throu Alibag Police Station
Adv. Pawar S. S.
Respondent(s)
Mahendra Dattatreya Late
Hearing History
Judge: 15-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 11-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 28-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 19-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 17-01-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The bail application of Mahendra Dattatrey Late, accused of sexually harassing, blackmailing, and inappropriately touching a 16-year-old girl over more than a year, has been rejected. The Special Judge found prima facie serious allegations under BNS Sections 75, 76, 78, 79 and POCSO Act Sections 8, 12, 17, noting concerns about witness intimidation (the victim's mother filed a no-objection affidavit while accused was in jail), proximity to the victim enabling evidence tampering, and pending forensic evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The bail application of Mahendra Dattatrey Late, accused of sexually harassing, blackmailing, and inappropriately touching a 16-year-old girl over more than a year, has been rejected. The Special Judge found prima facie serious allegations under BNS Sections 75, 76, 78, 79 and POCSO Act Sections 8, 12, 17, noting concerns about witness intimidation (the victim's mother filed a no-objection affidavit while accused was in jail), proximity to the victim enabling evidence tampering, and pending forensic evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts