State of Maharashtra vs Vilas Asha Gadkhal — 37/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64,64(2)(d),. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG010011692024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
286/2024
Filing Date
04-10-2024
Registration No
37/2024
Registration Date
04-10-2024
Court
District and Session Court Raigad
Judge
17-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
232
Police Station
Pen Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Vilas Asha Gadkhal
Hearing History
Judge: 17-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
List of Witness
List of Witness
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 16-02-2026 | List of Witness | |
| 04-02-2026 | List of Witness |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge at Alibag, Raigad acquitted accused Vilas Aasha Gadkhal of charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), 2012, finding that both the victim and her mother turned hostile to the prosecution case, with neither having any complaint against the accused. The court determined that the prosecution failed to prove any offense beyond reasonable doubt, as key witnesses testified that the victim was above 18 years old when married to the accused and did not wish to proceed with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge at Alibag, Raigad acquitted accused Vilas Aasha Gadkhal of charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), 2012, finding that both the victim and her mother turned hostile to the prosecution case, with neither having any complaint against the accused. The court determined that the prosecution failed to prove any offense beyond reasonable doubt, as key witnesses testified that the victim was above 18 years old when married to the accused and did not wish to proceed with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts