Nilima Deepak Mhatre vs Division Manager Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Advocate - Lele J. A. — 170/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition

CNR: MHRG010009022024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-08-2024

Filing Number

697/2024

Filing Date

05-08-2024

Registration No

170/2024

Registration Date

06-08-2024

Court

District and Session Court Raigad

Judge

16-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Nilima Deepak Mhatre

Adv. PATIL ANANT DEVJI

Pratik Deepak Mhatre

Adv. PATIL ANANT DEVJI

Kartiki Deepak Mhatre

Adv. PATIL ANANT DEVJI

Hirachandra Narayan Mhatre

Adv. PATIL ANANT DEVJI

Parvati Hirachandra Mhatre

Adv. PATIL ANANT DEVJI

Respondent(s)

Division Manager Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Advocate - Lele J. A.

Hearing History

Judge: 16-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Judgment

06-03-2026

Arguments

25-02-2026

Arguments

17-02-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal found the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation liable for a fatal accident caused by negligent overtaking by its bus driver, awarding Rs. 16,92,500 in compensation to the deceased's five legal heirs (wife, two children, and parents). The tribunal rejected the driver's defense due to lack of corroborating evidence and reliance on police investigation findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal found the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation liable for a fatal accident caused by negligent overtaking by its bus driver, awarding Rs. 16,92,500 in compensation to the deceased's five legal heirs (wife, two children, and parents). The tribunal rejected the driver's defense due to lack of corroborating evidence and reliance on police investigation findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court Raigad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case