Chandrakant Kashinath Pawar vs State of Maharashtra throu Poynad Police Station — 23/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED AND SENTENCED on 02nd April 2026.
Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal
CNR: MHRG010008762025
e-Filing Number
31-07-2025
Filing Number
262/2025
Filing Date
01-08-2025
Registration No
23/2025
Registration Date
01-08-2025
Court
District and Session Court Raigad
Judge
16-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
FIR Details
FIR Number
219
Police Station
Poynad Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chandrakant Kashinath Pawar
Adv. Makani S.D.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra throu Poynad Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 16-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The Additional Sessions Judge of Alibag dismissed the appellant's criminal appeal and upheld his conviction under Section 354-A(1)(i) IPC for sexual harassment. The court found the prosecutrix's testimony credible and consistent, detailing how the accused touched her breast without consent under a false pretext on December 18, 2022, and rejected the defense's false implication plea as unsubstantiated. The court confirmed the sentence of six months rigorous imprisonment and Rs. 6,000 fine as proportionate and justified given the serious societal impact of offenses against women's modesty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary The Additional Sessions Judge of Alibag dismissed the appellant's criminal appeal and upheld his conviction under Section 354-A(1)(i) IPC for sexual harassment. The court found the prosecutrix's testimony credible and consistent, detailing how the accused touched her breast without consent under a false pretext on December 18, 2022, and rejected the defense's false implication plea as unsubstantiated. The court confirmed the sentence of six months rigorous imprisonment and Rs. 6,000 fine as proportionate and justified given the serious societal impact of offenses against women's modesty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts