Rupali marketing through Mahesh waman tandel vs State of Maharashtra and 1 ors — 14/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 16th April 2026.
Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal
CNR: MHRG010005442025
e-Filing Number
11-06-2025
Filing Number
178/2025
Filing Date
11-06-2025
Registration No
14/2025
Registration Date
11-06-2025
Court
District and Session Court Raigad
Judge
16-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
FIR Details
Police Station
Alibag Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rupali marketing through Mahesh waman tandel
Adv. Patil Sachin D.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra and 1 ors
Shekhar Ramkrushna Soparkar
Hearing History
Judge: 16-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
Appearance
Arguments
Awaiting R and P Lower Court
Awaiting R and P Lower Court
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-02-2026 | Awaiting R and P Lower Court |
| 15-01-2026 | Awaiting R and P Lower Court |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 14/2025 The court dismissed Criminal Appeal No. 14/2025 as withdrawn after both parties (Rupali Marketing Agency and respondent Shekhar Soparkar) agreed to an out-of-court settlement and the appellant chose not to proceed. Consequently, the accused was acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, his P.R. bond was cancelled, and his surety was discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 14/2025 The court dismissed Criminal Appeal No. 14/2025 as withdrawn after both parties (Rupali Marketing Agency and respondent Shekhar Soparkar) agreed to an out-of-court settlement and the appellant chose not to proceed. Consequently, the accused was acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, his P.R. bond was cancelled, and his surety was discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts