Yakub Baig Trust Panvel Through Chief Trustee Muzaffar Mustafa Baig vs The Assistant Charity Commissioner Advocate - D.G.P — 108/2024

Case under Public Trusts Act (maharashtra) Section B/108(R). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th April 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG010005022024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

26-04-2024

Filing Number

393/2024

Filing Date

26-04-2024

Registration No

108/2024

Registration Date

26-04-2024

Court

District and Session Court Raigad

Judge

1-Principal District Sesssions Judge

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Public Trusts Act (Maharashtra) Section B/108(R)

Petitioner(s)

Yakub Baig Trust Panvel Through Chief Trustee Muzaffar Mustafa Baig

Adv. Surendra Joshi

Respondent(s)

The Assistant Charity Commissioner Advocate - D.G.P

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Sesssions Judge

07-04-2026

Disposed

04-04-2026

Order

01-04-2026

Hearing

24-03-2026

Hearing

18-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court appointed four qualified trustees to the Yakub Baig Trust, Panvel for a five-year term: Yusuf Akbar Khan, Mansoor Mohammad Mustafa Yakub Baig, Tausif Taslim Shaikh, and Ahmad Ali Soharab Alam Khan. The court strictly enforced the Trust Scheme's educational qualification requiring knowledge of Marathi, English, and Urdu (supported by certificates/mark-sheets), rejecting 13 candidates who lacked substantive proficiency in these languages, particularly Urdu, which the court deemed essential for Muslim Trust administration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court appointed four qualified trustees to the Yakub Baig Trust, Panvel for a five-year term: Yusuf Akbar Khan, Mansoor Mohammad Mustafa Yakub Baig, Tausif Taslim Shaikh, and Ahmad Ali Soharab Alam Khan. The court strictly enforced the Trust Scheme's educational qualification requiring knowledge of Marathi, English, and Urdu (supported by certificates/mark-sheets), rejecting 13 candidates who lacked substantive proficiency in these languages, particularly Urdu, which the court deemed essential for Muslim Trust administration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court Raigad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case