State of Maharashtra vs Ashish Nandkumar Talekar Advocate - Bangera A.S. — 37/2021
Case under Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(c),20(B). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG010004602021
Filing Number
155/2021
Filing Date
27-Apr-2021
Registration No
37/2021
Registration Date
30-Apr-2021
Court
District and Session Court Raigad
Judge
1-Principal District Sesssions Judge
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 30-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
15
Police Station
Revdanda police station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ashish Nandkumar Talekar Advocate - Bangera A.S.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ashish Nandkumar Talekar (37/2021) Decision: Accused Ashish Nandkumar Talekar was acquitted of charges under sections 8(c) and 20(b) of the NDPS Act, 1985, for possession of 8.4 kg ganja. The court found critical procedural violations including non-compliance with mandatory sections 50, 52A, and 57 of the NDPS Act—specifically, only partial compliance with Section 50 (informing accused of search rights), failure to prepare inventory before a magistrate, improper sample collection at seizure site rather than before magistrate, and no report filed to superior within 48 hours. The court held that such violations created reasonable doubt, rendering the chemical analysis report unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgment
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
08-Jan-2026
Formal Hearing
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Formal Hearing
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
03-Nov-2025
Formal Hearing
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
18-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
31-Jul-2025
Formal Hearing
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
05-Jul-2025
Formal Hearing
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
29-May-2025
Formal Hearing
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
28-Apr-2025
Formal Hearing
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
27-Mar-2025
Formal Hearing
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
06-Feb-2025
Formal Hearing
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
04-Jan-2025
Formal Hearing
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
14-Nov-2024
Formal Hearing
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
30-Sep-2024
Formal Hearing
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
22-Aug-2024
Formal Hearing
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
25-Jul-2024
Formal Hearing
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
15-Jun-2024
Formal Hearing
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
25-Apr-2024
Formal Hearing
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
08-Apr-2024
Formal Hearing
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
16-Mar-2024
List of Witness
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
12-Feb-2024
List of Witness
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
22-Jan-2024
List of Witness
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
21-Dec-2023
List of Witness
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
20-Nov-2023
List of Witness
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
19-Oct-2023
List of Witness
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
18-Sep-2023
List of Witness
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
21-Aug-2023
List of Witness
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
27-Jul-2023
List of Witness
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
06-Jul-2023
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
08-Jun-2023
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
04-May-2023
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
13-Apr-2023
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
23-Mar-2023
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
27-Feb-2023
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
09-Feb-2023
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
23-Jan-2023
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
14-Dec-2022
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
28-Nov-2022
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
10-Nov-2022
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
19-Oct-2022
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
29-Sep-2022
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
08-Sep-2022
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
12-Aug-2022
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
25-Jul-2022
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
30-Jun-2022
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
15-Jun-2022
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
15-Mar-2022
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
15-Jan-2022
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
16-Dec-2021
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
12-Nov-2021
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
30-Oct-2021
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
29-Sep-2021
Charge
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
13-Aug-2021
Awaiting Summons
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
12-Jul-2021
Awaiting Summons
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
11-Jun-2021
Awaiting Summons
Principal District Sesssions Judge
-
04-May-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Apr-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 37/2021
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ashish Nandkumar Talekar (37/2021) Decision: Accused Ashish Nandkumar Talekar was acquitted of charges under sections 8(c) and 20(b) of the NDPS Act, 1985, for possession of 8.4 kg ganja. The court found critical procedural violations including non-compliance with mandatory sections 50, 52A, and 57 of the NDPS Act—specifically, only partial compliance with Section 50 (informing accused of search rights), failure to prepare inventory before a magistrate, improper sample collection at seizure site rather than before magistrate, and no report filed to superior within 48 hours. The court held that such violations created reasonable doubt, rendering the chemical analysis report unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts