Vasundhara Developers Through Pratik Nitin Amburle vs Government Through Murud Police Station — 20/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG010002192026

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

76/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

20/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Court Raigad

Judge

17-District Judge-2 And Addl.sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 30-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

7

Police Station

Murud Police station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vasundhara Developers Through Pratik Nitin Amburle

    Adv. THAKUR PRAVIN MADHUKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government Through Murud Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Vasundhara Developers v. State (Cri.M.A. 20/2026) The court allowed the applicant's vehicle return application, releasing a seized Hyundai excavator machine to its registered owner Pratik Nitin Amburle on interim basis. The court found that the two-month investigation was substantially complete and that stringent conditions could address police concerns about misuse or sale, while prolonged detention would unfairly depreciate the equipment and harm the owner's livelihood. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-2 And Addl.sessions Judge

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    District Judge-2 And Addl.sessions Judge

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Vasundhara Developers v. State (Cri.M.A. 20/2026) The court allowed the applicant's vehicle return application, releasing a seized Hyundai excavator machine to its registered owner Pratik Nitin Amburle on interim basis. The court found that the two-month investigation was substantially complete and that stringent conditions could address police concerns about misuse or sale, while prolonged detention would unfairly depreciate the equipment and harm the owner's livelihood. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case