Vicky Vikram Durgavale vs Government Through Murud Police Station — 19/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG010002172026

e-Filing Number

27-02-2026

Filing Number

75/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

19/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Court Raigad

Judge

17-District Judge-2 And Addl.sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 30-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

7

Police Station

Murud Police station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vicky Vikram Durgavale

    Adv. THAKUR PRAVIN MADHUKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government Through Murud Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed Vicky Vikram Durgavale's application for interim custody of his seized TATA Dumper/Tipper vehicle, finding that the two-month investigation was substantially complete and that prolonged detention would harm the owner's livelihood and depreciate the asset. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 25 lakh surety bond, prohibiting sale, transfer, modification, or use for criminal purposes, while reserving the right to call the vehicle for identification during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-2 And Addl.sessions Judge

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    District Judge-2 And Addl.sessions Judge

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed Vicky Vikram Durgavale's application for interim custody of his seized TATA Dumper/Tipper vehicle, finding that the two-month investigation was substantially complete and that prolonged detention would harm the owner's livelihood and depreciate the asset. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 25 lakh surety bond, prohibiting sale, transfer, modification, or use for criminal purposes, while reserving the right to call the vehicle for identification during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case