Vicky Vikram Durgavale vs Government Through Murud Police Station — 19/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG010002172026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
75/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
19/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court Raigad
Judge
17-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
7
Police Station
Murud Police station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vicky Vikram Durgavale
Adv. THAKUR PRAVIN MADHUKAR
Respondent(s)
Government Through Murud Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 17-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
Order on Exh
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 28-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court allowed Vicky Vikram Durgavale's application for interim custody of his seized TATA Dumper/Tipper vehicle, finding that the two-month investigation was substantially complete and that prolonged detention would harm the owner's livelihood and depreciate the asset. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 25 lakh surety bond, prohibiting sale, transfer, modification, or use for criminal purposes, while reserving the right to call the vehicle for identification during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed Vicky Vikram Durgavale's application for interim custody of his seized TATA Dumper/Tipper vehicle, finding that the two-month investigation was substantially complete and that prolonged detention would harm the owner's livelihood and depreciate the asset. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 25 lakh surety bond, prohibiting sale, transfer, modification, or use for criminal purposes, while reserving the right to call the vehicle for identification during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts