Vasundhara Infra Developers Thorugh Nitin Namdev Amburle vs Government Through Murud Police Station — 16/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG010002102026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
71/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
16/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court Raigad
Judge
17-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
7
Police Station
Murud Police station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vasundhara Infra Developers Thorugh Nitin Namdev Amburle
Adv. THAKUR PRAVIN MADHUKAR
Respondent(s)
Government Through Murud Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 17-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 04-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 28-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted Vasundhara Infra Developers' application for interim return of a seized Hyundai excavator machine, finding the two-month investigation nearly complete and that detention would cause depreciation and harm the owner's livelihood. The excavator was released on a Rs. 35 lakh surety bond with strict conditions prohibiting sale, transfer, modification, or misuse, and requiring the owner to produce it whenever ordered by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted Vasundhara Infra Developers' application for interim return of a seized Hyundai excavator machine, finding the two-month investigation nearly complete and that detention would cause depreciation and harm the owner's livelihood. The excavator was released on a Rs. 35 lakh surety bond with strict conditions prohibiting sale, transfer, modification, or misuse, and requiring the owner to produce it whenever ordered by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts