Vasundhara Infra Developers Thorugh Nitin Namdev Amburle vs Government Through Murud Police Station — 16/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG010002102026

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

71/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

16/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Court Raigad

Judge

17-District Judge-2 And Addl.sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 30-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

7

Police Station

Murud Police station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vasundhara Infra Developers Thorugh Nitin Namdev Amburle

    Adv. THAKUR PRAVIN MADHUKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government Through Murud Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court granted Vasundhara Infra Developers' application for interim return of a seized Hyundai excavator machine, finding the two-month investigation nearly complete and that detention would cause depreciation and harm the owner's livelihood. The excavator was released on a Rs. 35 lakh surety bond with strict conditions prohibiting sale, transfer, modification, or misuse, and requiring the owner to produce it whenever ordered by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-2 And Addl.sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    District Judge-2 And Addl.sessions Judge

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    District Judge-2 And Addl.sessions Judge

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted Vasundhara Infra Developers' application for interim return of a seized Hyundai excavator machine, finding the two-month investigation nearly complete and that detention would cause depreciation and harm the owner's livelihood. The excavator was released on a Rs. 35 lakh surety bond with strict conditions prohibiting sale, transfer, modification, or misuse, and requiring the owner to produce it whenever ordered by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case