Om Shiv Sai Construction Through Nitin Namdev Amburle vs Government Through Murud Police Station — 15/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG010002092026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
70/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
15/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court Raigad
Judge
17-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
7
Police Station
Murud Police station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Om Shiv Sai Construction Through Nitin Namdev Amburle
Adv. THAKUR PRAVIN MADHUKAR
Respondent(s)
Government Through Murud Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 17-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 04-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 28-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal M.A. No. 15/2026 The court granted Nitin Namdev Amburle's application for interim custody of a seized Pneumatic Crawler Drill-FMT 100 Drilling Machine. The Additional Sessions Judge found that with a two-month investigation period already elapsed, stringent conditions could adequately protect police interests, and detaining the equipment indefinitely would unjustly harm the owner's livelihood and cause equipment depreciation. The machine was released on a Rs. 20 lakh bond, with conditions prohibiting transfer, modification, or misuse, and requiring production on court order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal M.A. No. 15/2026 The court granted Nitin Namdev Amburle's application for interim custody of a seized Pneumatic Crawler Drill-FMT 100 Drilling Machine. The Additional Sessions Judge found that with a two-month investigation period already elapsed, stringent conditions could adequately protect police interests, and detaining the equipment indefinitely would unjustly harm the owner's livelihood and cause equipment depreciation. The machine was released on a Rs. 20 lakh bond, with conditions prohibiting transfer, modification, or misuse, and requiring production on court order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts