Avinash Vitthal Khot vs Government Through Murud Police Station — 14/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG010002082026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
69/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
14/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court Raigad
Judge
17-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
7
Police Station
Murud Police station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Avinash Vitthal Khot
Adv. THAKUR PRAVIN MADHUKAR
Respondent(s)
Government Through Murud Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 17-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
Order on Exh
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 28-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal M.A. No. 14/2026 The court allowed Avinash Vitthal Khot's application for interim custody of his TATA 1612 Tanker seized in criminal case C.R. No. 7/2026 by Murud Police Station. The court found that since the FIR was filed two months prior (13.01.2026), investigation was substantially complete and the vehicle's prolonged detention would cause unnecessary depreciation and harm to the applicant's livelihood. The court granted release on executing a surety bond of Rs. 25 lakhs with strict conditions: the applicant must not transfer, modify, or misuse the vehicle, must maintain its identifiable condition, and must produce it upon court order until trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal M.A. No. 14/2026 The court allowed Avinash Vitthal Khot's application for interim custody of his TATA 1612 Tanker seized in criminal case C.R. No. 7/2026 by Murud Police Station. The court found that since the FIR was filed two months prior (13.01.2026), investigation was substantially complete and the vehicle's prolonged detention would cause unnecessary depreciation and harm to the applicant's livelihood. The court granted release on executing a surety bond of Rs. 25 lakhs with strict conditions: the applicant must not transfer, modify, or misuse the vehicle, must maintain its identifiable condition, and must produce it upon court order until trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts