Nitin Namdev Amburle vs Government Through Murud Police Station — 13/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG010002072026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
68/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
13/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Court Raigad
Judge
17-District Judge-2 And Addl.sessions Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 30-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
7
Police Station
Murud Police station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nitin Namdev Amburle
Adv. THAKUR PRAVIN MADHUKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government Through Murud Police Station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Criminal M.A. No. 13/2026 The court granted Nitin Namdev Amburle's application for interim custody of two TATA Dumper/Tipper vehicles seized in crime case C.R.No. 7/2026. The court found that investigation was substantially complete (two months after FIR filing) and that prolonged detention would cause vehicle depreciation and harm the applicant's livelihood, noting police concerns could be addressed through strict conditions rather than continued seizure. The vehicles were released on a Rs. 50 lakh security bond with conditions prohibiting transfer, modification, criminal use, or alteration of the vehicles' appearance until trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-2 And Addl.sessions Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
District Judge-2 And Addl.sessions Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 13/2026
Case Summary: Criminal M.A. No. 13/2026 The court granted Nitin Namdev Amburle's application for interim custody of two TATA Dumper/Tipper vehicles seized in crime case C.R.No. 7/2026. The court found that investigation was substantially complete (two months after FIR filing) and that prolonged detention would cause vehicle depreciation and harm the applicant's livelihood, noting police concerns could be addressed through strict conditions rather than continued seizure. The vehicles were released on a Rs. 50 lakh security bond with conditions prohibiting transfer, modification, criminal use, or alteration of the vehicles' appearance until trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts