State of Maharashtra vs Roshan Arun Koli and 4 Advocate - Parkar M. M. — 7/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304,308,312,313,314,323,498(A),34,201. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHRG010001182023
Next Hearing
12th May 2026
e-Filing Number
20-10-2022
Filing Number
32/2023
Filing Date
21-01-2023
Registration No
7/2023
Registration Date
21-01-2023
Court
District and Session Court Raigad
Judge
17-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
FIR Details
FIR Number
57
Police Station
Dadar Coastal Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Roshan Arun Koli and 4 Advocate - Parkar M. M.
Subhadra Arun Koli
Dr. Shekhar Ramdas Dhumal
Devata Vinayak Bhoir
Vinayak Govardhan Bhoir
Hearing History
Judge: 17-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 17-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 16-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 28-01-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Bail Application Rejected – Accused No. 1 Roshan Arun Koli's third bail application was dismissed on October 3, 2023. The Sessions Judge held that he is the primary accused in a POCSO case involving illegal abortion leading to death and is not entitled to bail on parity grounds, despite another co-accused being released. The court found his role fundamentally different and noted the trial had already commenced, with no changed circumstances warranting bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Bail Application Rejected – Accused No. 1 Roshan Arun Koli's third bail application was dismissed on October 3, 2023. The Sessions Judge held that he is the primary accused in a POCSO case involving illegal abortion leading to death and is not entitled to bail on parity grounds, despite another co-accused being released. The court found his role fundamentally different and noted the trial had already commenced, with no changed circumstances warranting bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts