State of Maharashtra vs Rojesh Nagu Mhatre and 1 Advocate - Ligal Aid through Adv Manisha Nagaonkar — 4/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,201,34,397. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHRG010001152023
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
03-09-2022
Filing Number
29/2023
Filing Date
21-01-2023
Registration No
4/2023
Registration Date
21-01-2023
Court
District and Session Court Raigad
Judge
17-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
FIR Details
FIR Number
75
Police Station
Pen Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Rojesh Nagu Mhatre and 1 Advocate - Ligal Aid through Adv Manisha Nagaonkar
Govardhan Sitaram Waghmare
Hearing History
Judge: 17-DISTRICT JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: Bail Application No. 86/2025 filed by accused Rojesh Nagu Mhatre in a murder case (IPC Sections 302, 201, 397) was rejected. The court held that while only Constitutional Courts (Supreme Court and High Courts) can invoke Article 21 for bail based on trial delay, the Sessions Court has independently found prima facie involvement of the accused in a gruesome murder with strong circumstantial evidence, CCTV footage, and recovered weapons, warranting continued detention. The court directed expedited trial completion within 3 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: Bail Application No. 86/2025 filed by accused Rojesh Nagu Mhatre in a murder case (IPC Sections 302, 201, 397) was rejected. The court held that while only Constitutional Courts (Supreme Court and High Courts) can invoke Article 21 for bail based on trial delay, the Sessions Court has independently found prima facie involvement of the accused in a gruesome murder with strong circumstantial evidence, CCTV footage, and recovered weapons, warranting continued detention. The court directed expedited trial completion within 3 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts