Kiran Govind Shigwan vs State of Maharashtra Through Pen Police Station and ors — 1/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438, 445. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.

Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application

CNR: MHRG010000032026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

30-12-2025

Filing Number

2/2026

Filing Date

01-01-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

01-01-2026

Court

District and Session Court Raigad

Judge

17-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438, 445

Petitioner(s)

Kiran Govind Shigwan

Adv. BANSODE VASANT SHRAVAN

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Pen Police Station and ors

Rekha Sachin Patil

Hearing History

Judge: 17-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE

16-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

24-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

09-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

29-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the criminal revision application, setting aside the lower court's rejection of a complaint against Sarpanch Rekha Sachin Patil for alleged forgery in relation to an unheald Gramsabha. The court found that the lower magistrate failed to comply with mandatory procedural requirements under BNSS Sections 173(4), 175(3), and 175(4), including the requirement for a sworn affidavit and consideration of police officer submissions, rendering the rejection order illegal and contrary to Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the criminal revision application, setting aside the lower court's rejection of a complaint against Sarpanch Rekha Sachin Patil for alleged forgery in relation to an unheald Gramsabha. The court found that the lower magistrate failed to comply with mandatory procedural requirements under BNSS Sections 173(4), 175(3), and 175(4), including the requirement for a sworn affidavit and consideration of police officer submissions, rendering the rejection order illegal and contrary to Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court Raigad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case