Kiran Govind Shigwan vs State of Maharashtra Through Pen Police Station and ors — 1/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438, 445. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.
Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application
CNR: MHRG010000032026
e-Filing Number
30-12-2025
Filing Number
2/2026
Filing Date
01-01-2026
Registration No
1/2026
Registration Date
01-01-2026
Court
District and Session Court Raigad
Judge
17-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kiran Govind Shigwan
Adv. BANSODE VASANT SHRAVAN
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Pen Police Station and ors
Rekha Sachin Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 17-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 24-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 29-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the criminal revision application, setting aside the lower court's rejection of a complaint against Sarpanch Rekha Sachin Patil for alleged forgery in relation to an unheald Gramsabha. The court found that the lower magistrate failed to comply with mandatory procedural requirements under BNSS Sections 173(4), 175(3), and 175(4), including the requirement for a sworn affidavit and consideration of police officer submissions, rendering the rejection order illegal and contrary to Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the criminal revision application, setting aside the lower court's rejection of a complaint against Sarpanch Rekha Sachin Patil for alleged forgery in relation to an unheald Gramsabha. The court found that the lower magistrate failed to comply with mandatory procedural requirements under BNSS Sections 173(4), 175(3), and 175(4), including the requirement for a sworn affidavit and consideration of police officer submissions, rendering the rejection order illegal and contrary to Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts