Dattatray Balasaheb Kapare vs The state of maharashtra Through Shikrapur police station — 113/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHPU380025642026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
1891/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
113/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Additional District Court Shirur
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ghodnadi Shirur.
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
126
Police Station
Shikrapur Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dattatray Balasaheb Kapare
Adv. BHUJBAL UMESH SATYAVAN
Respondent(s)
The state of maharashtra Through Shikrapur police station
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ghodnadi Shirur.
Disposed
Unready Board
Unready Board
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Unready Board | |
| 04-03-2026 | Unready Board |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted bail to applicant Dattatray Balasaheb Kapre in a criminal case under IPC sections 118(2), 118(1), 115(2), 352, 351(2)(3), and section 3(5) (related to alleged assault causing serious injury). While finding that investigation was substantially complete and the complainant no longer required hospitalization, the court determined continued custody was unnecessary. Bail was granted on conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 25,000, monthly reporting to police, refraining from witness intimidation, and an undertaking to appear throughout trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted bail to applicant Dattatray Balasaheb Kapre in a criminal case under IPC sections 118(2), 118(1), 115(2), 352, 351(2)(3), and section 3(5) (related to alleged assault causing serious injury). While finding that investigation was substantially complete and the complainant no longer required hospitalization, the court determined continued custody was unnecessary. Bail was granted on conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 25,000, monthly reporting to police, refraining from witness intimidation, and an undertaking to appear throughout trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts