The state of Maharashtra Through Shirur Police station vs Niteshkumar Dhondibarao Dharmapurikar etc. — 518/2026
Case under Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7,12. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHPU380020822026
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1633/2026
Filing Date
24-07-2025
Registration No
518/2026
Registration Date
04-08-2025
Court
Additional District Court Shirur
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ghodnadi Shirur.
FIR Details
FIR Number
978
Police Station
Shirur Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The state of Maharashtra Through Shirur Police station
Adv. Spl PP
Respondent(s)
Niteshkumar Dhondibarao Dharmapurikar etc.
Pradeep Suresh Deshmukh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge Ghodnadi Shirur.
Charge
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 25-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 23-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 20-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 16-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary The anticipatory bail application filed by Pradip Suresh Deshmukh under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been rejected. The applicant was accused of abetting a bribe demand under Sections 7 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, allegedly facilitating a Rs. 5,000 bribe payment by making phone calls to the complainant and co-accused. The court found prima facie evidence of his involvement in the alleged offence based on investigation records and dismissed his plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The anticipatory bail application filed by Pradip Suresh Deshmukh under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been rejected. The applicant was accused of abetting a bribe demand under Sections 7 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, allegedly facilitating a Rs. 5,000 bribe payment by making phone calls to the complainant and co-accused. The court found prima facie evidence of his involvement in the alleged offence based on investigation records and dismissed his plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts