TEJSWINI VINAY VEDAK vs SUDHAKAR SHANKAR MAHAGAVKAR — 723/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,468,471,454. Status: Unready Board. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHPU260090642025

Unready Board

Next Hearing

25th May 2026

e-Filing Number

09-12-2025

Filing Number

9064/2025

Filing Date

10-12-2025

Registration No

723/2025

Registration Date

12-12-2025

Court

Civil Court,Vadgaon Maval

Judge

2-Jt.C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. COURT VADGAON MAVAL

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 420,467,468,471,454
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 329,322,318,336,338,61,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

TEJSWINI VINAY VEDAK

Adv. YUKTA RAJENDRA PAWAR

Respondent(s)

SUDHAKAR SHANKAR MAHAGAVKAR

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt.C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. COURT VADGAON MAVAL

13-03-2026

Unready Board

11-03-2026

Unready Board

10-03-2026

Unready Board

07-03-2026

Unready Board

04-03-2026

Unready Board

Interim Orders

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court rejected the applicant's petition seeking directions to register an FIR under section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, finding the dispute between the parties to be civil in nature rather than criminal. The court held that the applicant has civil remedies available, including appeal or revision against the ex-parte civil judgment, and noted that an FIR had already been registered (No. 341/2025). The complainant and witnesses are directed to appear before the court for verification of their statements under section 223 of the BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the applicant's petition seeking directions to register an FIR under section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, finding the dispute between the parties to be civil in nature rather than criminal. The court held that the applicant has civil remedies available, including appeal or revision against the ex-parte civil judgment, and noted that an FIR had already been registered (No. 341/2025). The complainant and witnesses are directed to appear before the court for verification of their statements under section 223 of the BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court,Vadgaon Maval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case