Sachin Mukund Bhagwat vs Manisha Tanaji Bhandalkar Advocate - Nimbale Atul Shankar — 3695/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU260051232023
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
26-10-2023
Filing Number
5123/2023
Filing Date
17-10-2023
Registration No
3695/2023
Registration Date
26-10-2023
Court
Civil Court,Vadgaon Maval
Judge
2-Jt.C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. COURT VADGAON MAVAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sachin Mukund Bhagwat
Adv. GARUD ANITA MAHENDRA
Respondent(s)
Manisha Tanaji Bhandalkar Advocate - Nimbale Atul Shankar
Shubham Tanaji Bhandalkar
Adv. Desai Amol pralhad
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. COURT VADGAON MAVAL
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 21-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 26-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a civil suit (S.P. No. 3695/2023) from Pune, Maharashtra involving a matrimonial property dispute. The court dismissed the petition and rejected the plaintiff's claims, finding that the accused (Accused No. 01) had been supporting the plaintiff since 2009, provided money for house construction, and that the plaintiff failed to substantiate her allegations with credible evidence. The case was adjourned to March 23, 2026 for final arguments, with the court noting that the plaintiff's statements contained contradictions and lacked supporting documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a civil suit (S.P. No. 3695/2023) from Pune, Maharashtra involving a matrimonial property dispute. The court dismissed the petition and rejected the plaintiff's claims, finding that the accused (Accused No. 01) had been supporting the plaintiff since 2009, provided money for house construction, and that the plaintiff failed to substantiate her allegations with credible evidence. The case was adjourned to March 23, 2026 for final arguments, with the court noting that the plaintiff's statements contained contradictions and lacked supporting documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts