Sachin Mukund Bhagwat vs Manisha Tanaji Bhandalkar Advocate - Nimbale Atul Shankar — 3695/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHPU260051232023

Evidence

Next Hearing

21st April 2026

e-Filing Number

26-10-2023

Filing Number

5123/2023

Filing Date

17-10-2023

Registration No

3695/2023

Registration Date

26-10-2023

Court

Civil Court,Vadgaon Maval

Judge

2-Jt.C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. COURT VADGAON MAVAL

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Sachin Mukund Bhagwat

Adv. GARUD ANITA MAHENDRA

Respondent(s)

Manisha Tanaji Bhandalkar Advocate - Nimbale Atul Shankar

Shubham Tanaji Bhandalkar

Adv. Desai Amol pralhad

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt.C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. COURT VADGAON MAVAL

23-03-2026

Evidence

07-03-2026

Evidence

21-02-2026

Evidence

29-01-2026

Evidence

26-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

21-02-2026
Evidence
07-03-2026
Evidence
23-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

This is a civil suit (S.P. No. 3695/2023) from Pune, Maharashtra involving a matrimonial property dispute. The court dismissed the petition and rejected the plaintiff's claims, finding that the accused (Accused No. 01) had been supporting the plaintiff since 2009, provided money for house construction, and that the plaintiff failed to substantiate her allegations with credible evidence. The case was adjourned to March 23, 2026 for final arguments, with the court noting that the plaintiff's statements contained contradictions and lacked supporting documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a civil suit (S.P. No. 3695/2023) from Pune, Maharashtra involving a matrimonial property dispute. The court dismissed the petition and rejected the plaintiff's claims, finding that the accused (Accused No. 01) had been supporting the plaintiff since 2009, provided money for house construction, and that the plaintiff failed to substantiate her allegations with credible evidence. The case was adjourned to March 23, 2026 for final arguments, with the court noting that the plaintiff's statements contained contradictions and lacked supporting documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court,Vadgaon Maval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case