State of Maharashtra Through Talegaon MIDC Police Station vs Sudarshan Vishnukant Chandrapatale Advocate - Jadhav Vishwanath Sudam — 608/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 454,380. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHPU260039462024

Evidence

Next Hearing

19th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

3945/2024

Filing Date

21-08-2024

Registration No

608/2024

Registration Date

22-08-2024

Court

Civil Court,Vadgaon Maval

Judge

7-4th CJJD AND JMFC VADGAON MAVAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

134

Police Station

Talegaon M.I.D.C. Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 454,380

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Talegaon MIDC Police Station

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Sudarshan Vishnukant Chandrapatale Advocate - Jadhav Vishwanath Sudam

Hearing History

Judge: 7-4th CJJD AND JMFC VADGAON MAVAL

02-04-2026

Evidence

07-03-2026

Hearing

27-02-2026

Hearing

23-02-2026

Formal Hearing

13-01-2026

Formal Hearing

Interim Orders

13-01-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary Bail Granted. Sudarshan Vishnukant Chandrapatle's bail application in CR No. 134/2024 (charges under IPC §454, 380) was allowed. The court released him on bail with personal bond and surety of Rs. 50,000 each, emphasizing the constitutional right to speedy trial and noting the accused has been in custody since July 1, 2024, while prosecution failed to secure witness attendance despite charge-sheet filing. Standard bail conditions apply, including non-tampering with evidence and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Bail Granted. Sudarshan Vishnukant Chandrapatle's bail application in CR No. 134/2024 (charges under IPC §454, 380) was allowed. The court released him on bail with personal bond and surety of Rs. 50,000 each, emphasizing the constitutional right to speedy trial and noting the accused has been in custody since July 1, 2024, while prosecution failed to secure witness attendance despite charge-sheet filing. Standard bail conditions apply, including non-tampering with evidence and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court,Vadgaon Maval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case