State of Maharashtra Through Talegaon MIDC Police Station vs Sudarshan Vishnukant Chandrapatale Advocate - Jadhav Vishwanath Sudam — 608/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 454,380. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU260039462024
Next Hearing
19th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3945/2024
Filing Date
21-08-2024
Registration No
608/2024
Registration Date
22-08-2024
Court
Civil Court,Vadgaon Maval
Judge
7-4th CJJD AND JMFC VADGAON MAVAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
134
Police Station
Talegaon M.I.D.C. Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Talegaon MIDC Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sudarshan Vishnukant Chandrapatale Advocate - Jadhav Vishwanath Sudam
Hearing History
Judge: 7-4th CJJD AND JMFC VADGAON MAVAL
Evidence
Hearing
Hearing
Formal Hearing
Formal Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 23-02-2026 | Formal Hearing | |
| 13-01-2026 | Formal Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Bail Granted. Sudarshan Vishnukant Chandrapatle's bail application in CR No. 134/2024 (charges under IPC §454, 380) was allowed. The court released him on bail with personal bond and surety of Rs. 50,000 each, emphasizing the constitutional right to speedy trial and noting the accused has been in custody since July 1, 2024, while prosecution failed to secure witness attendance despite charge-sheet filing. Standard bail conditions apply, including non-tampering with evidence and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Bail Granted. Sudarshan Vishnukant Chandrapatle's bail application in CR No. 134/2024 (charges under IPC §454, 380) was allowed. The court released him on bail with personal bond and surety of Rs. 50,000 each, emphasizing the constitutional right to speedy trial and noting the accused has been in custody since July 1, 2024, while prosecution failed to secure witness attendance despite charge-sheet filing. Standard bail conditions apply, including non-tampering with evidence and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts