State of Maharashtra Through Lonawala Rural Police Station vs Rahul Ashok Shinde — 508/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,465,467,468,471,120B. Status: Production of Accused. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU260033152024
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3314/2024
Filing Date
20-07-2024
Registration No
508/2024
Registration Date
22-07-2024
Court
Civil Court,Vadgaon Maval
Judge
2-Jt.C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. COURT VADGAON MAVAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
121
Police Station
LONAWALA RURAL POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Lonawala Rural Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rahul Ashok Shinde
Aslam Babamiya Mulani
Anil Raghu Shinde
Satish Ashok Kalekar(Saplimentary Charge Sheet on 04.11.
Nitin Arjun Punekar
Shubham Laxman Dikav
Satyan Dinesh Patel -CRPC 299
Punit Shankarlal Patel-CRPC 299
Darshan Chagan Patel -CRPC 299
Tushar Chandubhai Patel
Aman Balvant Patel-CRPC 299
Nirmala Ashok Kurhade
Kiran Govind Gaikwad(Saplimentary Charge Sheet on 04.11.
Amol Abu Thakar
Gorakha Nathu Kedari (Saplimentary Charge Sheet on 04.11.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. COURT VADGAON MAVAL
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 07-03-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 24-02-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 11-02-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 29-01-2026 | Production of Accused |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by Accused Nos. 4, 13, and 15 for relaxation of the condition to deposit amounts transacted in their bank accounts has been rejected. The court found that the cited Supreme Court judgment on anticipatory bail was not applicable to the case and that the accused had active participation in the alleged crime with specific records of money transactions in their accounts, making them ineligible for the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by Accused Nos. 4, 13, and 15 for relaxation of the condition to deposit amounts transacted in their bank accounts has been rejected. The court found that the cited Supreme Court judgment on anticipatory bail was not applicable to the case and that the accused had active participation in the alleged crime with specific records of money transactions in their accounts, making them ineligible for the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts