Megha Sameer Virulkar vs Sameer Narendra Virulkar Advocate - Kadlak Rajshree D — 385/2023

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHPU260023922023

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2392/2023

Filing Date

22-06-2023

Registration No

385/2023

Registration Date

22-06-2023

Court

Civil Court,Vadgaon Maval

Judge

2-Jt.C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. COURT VADGAON MAVAL

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section 125

Petitioner(s)

Megha Sameer Virulkar

Adv. Sudarshan Sadaphule

Respondent(s)

Sameer Narendra Virulkar Advocate - Kadlak Rajshree D

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt.C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. COURT VADGAON MAVAL

07-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

31-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

17-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

28-11-2025

Evidence Part Heard

13-10-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

15-12-2023
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court partly allowed the application and granted interim maintenance of Rs. 5,000 per month to the applicant (Megha) and her daughter under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and restrained the non-applicant from committing any act of domestic violence during the pendency of the application. The court rejected the applicant's claims for Rs. 18,000 monthly maintenance, cost of proceedings, and return of personal belongings, deferring those matters to final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court partly allowed the application and granted interim maintenance of Rs. 5,000 per month to the applicant (Megha) and her daughter under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and restrained the non-applicant from committing any act of domestic violence during the pendency of the application. The court rejected the applicant's claims for Rs. 18,000 monthly maintenance, cost of proceedings, and return of personal belongings, deferring those matters to final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court,Vadgaon Maval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case