Shravan Shankarlal Chaudhary vs Babasaheb Urf Balasaheb Sitaram Dahifale Advocate - tambe shivdas dnyaneshwar — 1657/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU250036982023
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
06-12-2023
Filing Number
2876/2023
Filing Date
06-12-2023
Registration No
1657/2023
Registration Date
12-12-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Junnar
Judge
2-2nd Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C Junnar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shravan Shankarlal Chaudhary
Adv. Vishwanath Ashok Nalawade
Respondent(s)
Babasaheb Urf Balasaheb Sitaram Dahifale Advocate - tambe shivdas dnyaneshwar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. C.J.J.D and J.M.F.C Junnar
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 21-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 08-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 13-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The application for bail forfeiture is rejected. The court found the complainant was not genuinely pursuing the trial but misusing the court as a recovery agency, evident from his failure to file evidence affidavits and repeated NBW applications while remaining absent. The complainant is ordered to pay Rs. 1,000 cost for wasting court time, with dismissal of the complaint if payment is not made by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The application for bail forfeiture is rejected. The court found the complainant was not genuinely pursuing the trial but misusing the court as a recovery agency, evident from his failure to file evidence affidavits and repeated NBW applications while remaining absent. The complainant is ordered to pay Rs. 1,000 cost for wasting court time, with dismissal of the complaint if payment is not made by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts