The state of maharashtra Through Excesie office Narayangaon vs Nitin Macchindra Bhujbal — 606/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU250015072025
Filing Number
1398/2025
Filing Date
03-Jul-2025
Registration No
606/2025
Registration Date
09-Jul-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Junnar
Judge
3-4 th C. J.J. D. and J.M.F.C Junnar
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
331
Police Station
STATE EXCISE NARAYANGAON
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The state of maharashtra Through Excesie office Narayangaon
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nitin Macchindra Bhujbal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Junnar, disposed of case S.C.C. 606/2025 against Nitin Macchindra Bhujbal under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, discharging the accused for the offence under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act due to prosecution's failure to secure his presence and absence of a Chemical Analysis report. However, the seized property was ordered to be confiscated to the State under Section 98 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
4 th C. J.J. D. and J.M.F.C Junnar
-
07-Mar-2026
Unready Board
4 th C. J.J. D. and J.M.F.C Junnar
-
13-Jan-2026
Unready Board
4 th C. J.J. D. and J.M.F.C Junnar
-
04-Dec-2025
Unready Board
4 th C. J.J. D. and J.M.F.C Junnar
-
02-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 606/2025
The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Junnar, disposed of case S.C.C. 606/2025 against Nitin Macchindra Bhujbal under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, discharging the accused for the offence under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act due to prosecution's failure to secure his presence and absence of a Chemical Analysis report. However, the seized property was ordered to be confiscated to the State under Section 98 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts