The state of maharashtra Through Excesie office Narayangaon vs Nitin Macchindra Bhujbal — 606/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU250015072025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1398/2025
Filing Date
03-07-2025
Registration No
606/2025
Registration Date
09-07-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Junnar
Judge
3-4 th C. J.J. D. and J.M.F.C Junnar
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
331
Police Station
STATE EXCISE NARAYANGAON
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The state of maharashtra Through Excesie office Narayangaon
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Nitin Macchindra Bhujbal
Hearing History
Judge: 3-4 th C. J.J. D. and J.M.F.C Junnar
Disposed
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Unready Board | |
| 13-01-2026 | Unready Board | |
| 04-12-2025 | Unready Board | |
| 02-09-2025 | Unready Board |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Junnar, disposed of case S.C.C. 606/2025 against Nitin Macchindra Bhujbal under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, discharging the accused for the offence under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act due to prosecution's failure to secure his presence and absence of a Chemical Analysis report. However, the seized property was ordered to be confiscated to the State under Section 98 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Junnar, disposed of case S.C.C. 606/2025 against Nitin Macchindra Bhujbal under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, discharging the accused for the offence under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act due to prosecution's failure to secure his presence and absence of a Chemical Analysis report. However, the seized property was ordered to be confiscated to the State under Section 98 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts