Minal Vinayak Mule vs Vinayak Ananta Mule Advocate - Chaskar Vinod Namdev — 32/2023
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section S.12,14,17,18,19,20,23. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHPU240018172023
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
08-10-2023
Filing Number
1597/2023
Filing Date
09-10-2023
Registration No
32/2023
Registration Date
09-10-2023
Court
Civil Court,Ghodegaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J. M. F. C., Ghodegaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Minal Vinayak Mule
Adv. POKHARKAR VITHAL BHAGACHAND
Shrisha Vinayak Mule
Adv. POKHARKAR VITHAL BHAGACHAND
Respondent(s)
Vinayak Ananta Mule Advocate - Chaskar Vinod Namdev
Ananta Mahadu Mule
Jayashri Ananta Mule
Devendra Ananta Mule
Supriya Devendra Mule
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J. M. F. C., Ghodegaon
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 02-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 02-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 10-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: In PWDVA Application No. 32/2023 (Meenal Mule vs. Vinayak Mule & ors.), the non-applicant's application challenging the court's territorial jurisdiction was rejected. The court found that the applicant resides within the court's jurisdiction at Manchar (Nakshatra Society) and previously resided jointly with the non-applicant at Madhuban Society in the same area, supported by documentary evidence including a school fee receipt dated 10.06.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In PWDVA Application No. 32/2023 (Meenal Mule vs. Vinayak Mule & ors.), the non-applicant's application challenging the court's territorial jurisdiction was rejected. The court found that the applicant resides within the court's jurisdiction at Manchar (Nakshatra Society) and previously resided jointly with the non-applicant at Madhuban Society in the same area, supported by documentary evidence including a school fee receipt dated 10.06.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts