Sopan Gajanan Pokharkar vs Ramdas Mahadu Pokharkar Advocate - Nighote Navnath Rajaram — 226/2022

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHPU240017702022

Evidence

Next Hearing

06th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

286/2022

Filing Date

06-09-2022

Registration No

226/2022

Registration Date

06-09-2022

Court

Civil Court,Ghodegaon

Judge

2-2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C., Ghodegaon.

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,

Petitioner(s)

Sopan Gajanan Pokharkar

Adv. R D Gokule

Anusaya Gajanan Pokharkar

Adv. R D Gokule

Sangita Arjun Chikhale

Adv. R D Gokule

Respondent(s)

Ramdas Mahadu Pokharkar Advocate - Nighote Navnath Rajaram

Bharat Mahadu Pokharkar

Adv. Nighote Navnath Rajaram

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C., Ghodegaon.

07-03-2026

Evidence

07-02-2026

Arguments

03-01-2026

Arguments

06-12-2025

Arguments

11-11-2025

W.S. and Say

Interim Orders

07-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary The petition seeking to amend or add new issues in a partition suit was dismissed/rejected. The court found that the existing issues already framed on 01/04/2025 adequately cover the plaintiff's contentions, and the court declined to frame additional issues regarding whether defendants can prove the disputed property (Gat No. 1329/1, measuring 00H 31R) was purchased by or is self-acquired property of Mahadu Anaji Pokharkar. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The petition seeking to amend or add new issues in a partition suit was dismissed/rejected. The court found that the existing issues already framed on 01/04/2025 adequately cover the plaintiff's contentions, and the court declined to frame additional issues regarding whether defendants can prove the disputed property (Gat No. 1329/1, measuring 00H 31R) was purchased by or is self-acquired property of Mahadu Anaji Pokharkar. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court,Ghodegaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case