Revannath Dadabhau Take vs Shivaji Vishnu Gorade Advocate - Manisha Ankush Mhaske — 206/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,. Status: Report. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU240014652022
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
260/2022
Filing Date
01-08-2022
Registration No
206/2022
Registration Date
01-08-2022
Court
Civil Court,Ghodegaon
Judge
3-Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Ghodegaon, Pune
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Revannath Dadabhau Take
Adv. Gawade Deepak Haushiram
Respondent(s)
Shivaji Vishnu Gorade Advocate - Manisha Ankush Mhaske
Dnyaneshwar Govind Take
Adv. Take Suresh Govind
Pravin Nanabhau Take
Adv. Take Suresh Govind
Ravindra Nanabhau Take
Adv. Take Suresh Govind
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Ghodegaon, Pune
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Report | |
| 21-01-2026 | Report | |
| 24-11-2025 | Report | |
| 03-10-2025 | Report | |
| 22-08-2025 | Report |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application for appointment of a Commissioner to conduct joint measurement of the disputed property. The T.I.L.R., Ambegaon was appointed as Court Commissioner to measure suit property Gat No.1628, 1629, 1665, and 1666 in village Shingave Pargaon, Tal. Ambegaon, District Pune, with a detailed map and report to be filed within one month. Both plaintiff and defendant no.1 were directed to deposit necessary measurement fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application for appointment of a Commissioner to conduct joint measurement of the disputed property. The T.I.L.R., Ambegaon was appointed as Court Commissioner to measure suit property Gat No.1628, 1629, 1665, and 1666 in village Shingave Pargaon, Tal. Ambegaon, District Pune, with a detailed map and report to be filed within one month. Both plaintiff and defendant no.1 were directed to deposit necessary measurement fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts