Bhagwan Ganpat Shinde vs Krushi Utpann Bajar Samiti Manchar tarfe Chairman Nilesh Vilas Thorat Advocate - Arvikar Sanjay Dattatray — 106/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU240008022025
e-Filing Number
12-06-2025
Filing Number
134/2025
Filing Date
12-Jun-2025
Registration No
106/2025
Registration Date
12-Jun-2025
Court
Civil Court,Ghodegaon
Judge
2-2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bhagwan Ganpat Shinde
Adv. GADEKAR SHRUNGAR PANDARINATH
-
2.Gautam Ganpat Shinde
Adv. GADEKAR SHRUNGAR PANDARINATH
-
3.Shobha Ganpat Shinde
Adv. NIGHOT NAVANATH RAJARAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.Krushi Utpann Bajar Samiti Manchar tarfe Chairman Nilesh Vilas Thorat Advocate - Arvikar Sanjay Dattatray
-
2.Manjulabai Ganpat Shinde
-
3.Sitabai Maruti Shinde
-
4.Vanita Suresh Dethe
-
5.Sandip Maruti Shinde
-
6.Sonal Vilas Waghmare
-
7.Minal Kamesh Thorat
-
8.Vaishali Shankar Shinde
-
9.Vikas Shankar Shinde
-
10.Subhadra Shankar Shinde
-
11.Shankar Sambhaji Shinde
Case History
-
16-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
SUMMARY: The court allowed Defendants 1 and 2's application to amend their written statement under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, finding that typographical errors caused them to inadvertently admit facts instead of denying them. The court determined this was a genuine typographical error necessary for deciding the suit on merit and would not prejudice the plaintiffs. Defendants must complete the amendment within 14 days and pay Rs. 100 as costs to the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Compliance
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
03-Feb-2026
Arguments
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
01-Jan-2026
Arguments
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
21-Nov-2025
Arguments
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
10-Oct-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
Arguments
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
15-Sep-2025
W.S. and Say
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
18-Aug-2025
Order on T.I.View PDF
-
18-Aug-2025
W.S. and Say
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
12-Aug-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
12-Aug-2025
Order
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
11-Aug-2025
Order
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
24-Jul-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
24-Jul-2025
Arguments
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
07-Jul-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
07-Jul-2025
W.S. and Say
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
30-Jun-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
30-Jun-2025
W.S. and Say
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
13-Jun-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
13-Jun-2025
Report
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
12-Jun-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
12-Jun-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
12-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 106/2025
SUMMARY: The court allowed Defendants 1 and 2's application to amend their written statement under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, finding that typographical errors caused them to inadvertently admit facts instead of denying them. The court determined this was a genuine typographical error necessary for deciding the suit on merit and would not prejudice the plaintiffs. Defendants must complete the amendment within 14 days and pay Rs. 100 as costs to the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts