Pratibha Vilas Khilari vs Vilas Pandurang Khilari Advocate - Gaikwad Dnyaneshwar Apparo — 8/2024

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,14,17,18,19,20,22,. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.

PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act

CNR: MHPU240006302024

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

18th April 2026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2024

Filing Number

562/2024

Filing Date

19-03-2024

Registration No

8/2024

Registration Date

19-03-2024

Court

Civil Court,Ghodegaon

Judge

2-2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C., Ghodegaon.

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,14,17,18,19,20,22,

Petitioner(s)

Pratibha Vilas Khilari

Adv. DHUMAL VISHVAJEET VINAYAK

Respondent(s)

Vilas Pandurang Khilari Advocate - Gaikwad Dnyaneshwar Apparo

Vimal Pandurang Khilari

Adv. Gaikwad Dnyaneshwar Apparo

Vaishali Pandurang Khilari

Adv. Gaikwad Dnyaneshwar Apparo

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C., Ghodegaon.

07-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

28-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

17-12-2025

Report

28-11-2025

Report

16-10-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

27-06-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed the respondents' application to set aside the "No Say" order dated 04/03/2025, subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 as cost to the applicants. The court held that while the respondents' excuse of lacking legal knowledge was not proper, following the principle of natural justice, they deserved an opportunity to file their response on the merits of the case. The respondents are directed to pay the cost and file their say on the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the respondents' application to set aside the "No Say" order dated 04/03/2025, subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 as cost to the applicants. The court held that while the respondents' excuse of lacking legal knowledge was not proper, following the principle of natural justice, they deserved an opportunity to file their response on the merits of the case. The respondents are directed to pay the cost and file their say on the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court,Ghodegaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case