Pratibha Vilas Khilari vs Vilas Pandurang Khilari Advocate - Gaikwad Dnyaneshwar Apparo — 8/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,14,17,18,19,20,22,. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHPU240006302024
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2024
Filing Number
562/2024
Filing Date
19-03-2024
Registration No
8/2024
Registration Date
19-03-2024
Court
Civil Court,Ghodegaon
Judge
2-2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C., Ghodegaon.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pratibha Vilas Khilari
Adv. DHUMAL VISHVAJEET VINAYAK
Respondent(s)
Vilas Pandurang Khilari Advocate - Gaikwad Dnyaneshwar Apparo
Vimal Pandurang Khilari
Adv. Gaikwad Dnyaneshwar Apparo
Vaishali Pandurang Khilari
Adv. Gaikwad Dnyaneshwar Apparo
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C., Ghodegaon.
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Report
Report
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 28-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 17-12-2025 | Report | |
| 28-11-2025 | Report | |
| 16-10-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the respondents' application to set aside the "No Say" order dated 04/03/2025, subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 as cost to the applicants. The court held that while the respondents' excuse of lacking legal knowledge was not proper, following the principle of natural justice, they deserved an opportunity to file their response on the merits of the case. The respondents are directed to pay the cost and file their say on the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the respondents' application to set aside the "No Say" order dated 04/03/2025, subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 as cost to the applicants. The court held that while the respondents' excuse of lacking legal knowledge was not proper, following the principle of natural justice, they deserved an opportunity to file their response on the merits of the case. The respondents are directed to pay the cost and file their say on the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts