Pratibha Vilas Khilari vs Vilas Pandurang Khilari Advocate - Gaikwad Dnyaneshwar Apparo — 8/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,14,17,18,19,20,22. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHPU240006302024
e-Filing Number
13-03-2024
Filing Number
562/2024
Filing Date
19-Mar-2024
Registration No
8/2024
Registration Date
19-Mar-2024
Court
Civil Court,Ghodegaon
Judge
2-2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pratibha Vilas Khilari
Adv. DHUMAL VISHVAJEET VINAYAK
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vilas Pandurang Khilari Advocate - Gaikwad Dnyaneshwar Apparo
-
2.Vimal Pandurang Khilari
Adv. Gaikwad Dnyaneshwar Apparo
-
3.Vaishali Pandurang Khilari
Adv. Gaikwad Dnyaneshwar Apparo
Case History
-
18-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
28-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
17-Dec-2025
Report
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
28-Nov-2025
Report
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
16-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
09-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
30-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
27-Jun-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court allowed the respondents' application to set aside the "No Say" order dated 04/03/2025, subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 as cost to the applicants. The court held that while the respondents' excuse of lacking legal knowledge was not proper, following the principle of natural justice, they deserved an opportunity to file their response on the merits of the case. The respondents are directed to pay the cost and file their say on the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
11-Jun-2025
Order on Exh
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
09-May-2025
Order on Exh
Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Ghodegaon, Pune
-
05-Apr-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
04-Mar-2025
Filing of Affidavit
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
04-Jan-2025
Steps_Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
04-Dec-2024
Steps_Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
04-Nov-2024
Steps_Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
04-Oct-2024
Steps_Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
04-Sep-2024
Steps_Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
05-Aug-2024
Steps_Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
04-Jul-2024
Awaiting Summons
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
27-Jun-2024
Awaiting Summons
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
04-Jun-2024
Awaiting Summons
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
02-May-2024
Awaiting Summons
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
22-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 8/2024
Summary: The court allowed the respondents' application to set aside the "No Say" order dated 04/03/2025, subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 as cost to the applicants. The court held that while the respondents' excuse of lacking legal knowledge was not proper, following the principle of natural justice, they deserved an opportunity to file their response on the merits of the case. The respondents are directed to pay the cost and file their say on the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts