Manda Savkar Gorade vs Anata Saba Jawale Advocate - Chavan Ulhas Dhondiba — 62/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 8,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU240006032023
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
102/2023
Filing Date
25-04-2023
Registration No
62/2023
Registration Date
25-04-2023
Court
Civil Court,Ghodegaon
Judge
2-2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C., Ghodegaon.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manda Savkar Gorade
Adv. Gavhane Vaishali Sanjay
Respondent(s)
Anata Saba Jawale Advocate - Chavan Ulhas Dhondiba
Pramila Ramesh Waghchaure
Adv. Chavan Ulhas Dhondiba
Sunita Sunil Kharat
Adv. Chavan Ulhas Dhondiba
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C., Ghodegaon.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 03-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 08-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 01-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Manda Savkar Gorade v. Anata Saba Jawale (RCS 62/2023) Outcome: The application for temporary injunction is partly allowed. The court granted an injunction restraining the defendants from creating third-party interests in the disputed agricultural property or alienating it until the final decision of the suit. However, the plaintiff's prayer to restrain obstruction to her peaceful possession was rejected due to lack of documentary evidence of possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Manda Savkar Gorade v. Anata Saba Jawale (RCS 62/2023) Outcome: The application for temporary injunction is partly allowed. The court granted an injunction restraining the defendants from creating third-party interests in the disputed agricultural property or alienating it until the final decision of the suit. However, the plaintiff's prayer to restrain obstruction to her peaceful possession was rejected due to lack of documentary evidence of possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts