Mahadu Dhondu Shinde vs Dnyaneshwar Fakira Doke Advocate - Gawade Sagar Balkrishana — 55/2026

Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 38. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

W.S. and Say Next hearing 16-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHPU240002532026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

64/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

55/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court,Ghodegaon

Judge

2-2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahadu Dhondu Shinde

    Adv. pokharkar balasaheb sitaram

  2. 2.Babaji Dhondu Shinde

    Adv. pokharkar balasaheb sitaram

  3. 3.Manda Ramdas Wagh

    Adv. pokharkar balasaheb sitaram

  4. 4.Nanda Chandrakant Varpe

    Adv. pokharkar balasaheb sitaram

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dnyaneshwar Fakira Doke Advocate - Gawade Sagar Balkrishana

  2. 2.Dattatray Bhikaji Morde

Case History

  1. 16-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: In RCS No. 55/2026 between Mahadu Dhondu Shinde vs. Dnyaneshwar Fakira Doke, the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ghodegaon (Pune) granted an adjournment for today only, subject to limitation. Exhibits 10 and 11 were seen and filed. The case is adjourned and will proceed on a future date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    W.S. and Say

    2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 55/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In RCS No. 55/2026 between Mahadu Dhondu Shinde vs. Dnyaneshwar Fakira Doke, the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ghodegaon (Pune) granted an adjournment for today only, subject to limitation. Exhibits 10 and 11 were seen and filed. The case is adjourned and will proceed on a future date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case