State Of Maharashtra Chakan Police Station vs Vishal Manik Raut (Abscond) — 731/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,465,467,471,34. Status: N.B.W._Unready. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU230029212023
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2921/2023
Filing Date
13-09-2023
Registration No
731/2023
Registration Date
13-09-2023
Court
Civil Court,Khed
Judge
1-Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. and J.M.F.C.
FIR Details
FIR Number
487
Police Station
CHAKAN POLICE STATION
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Maharashtra Chakan Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vishal Manik Raut (Abscond)
Manik Devram Raut
Sadhana Vishal Raut (Abscond)
Komal Somnath Thombre
Somnath Baban Thombre
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. and J.M.F.C.
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 10-02-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 23-01-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 09-01-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 23-12-2025 | N.B.W._Unready |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The bail application of accused Somnath Baban Thombare in connection with Crime No. 487/2023 (cheating, forgery, and criminal breach of trust charges involving Rs. 65 lakhs) was rejected. The court found substantial prima facie evidence that the applicant, as director of Rolling Forward Estate Company, actively participated in the fraud scheme and was a major beneficiary of the proceeds, despite his claims of non-involvement. The court also noted the risk of absconding given the co-accused's flight and the serious nature of the offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The bail application of accused Somnath Baban Thombare in connection with Crime No. 487/2023 (cheating, forgery, and criminal breach of trust charges involving Rs. 65 lakhs) was rejected. The court found substantial prima facie evidence that the applicant, as director of Rolling Forward Estate Company, actively participated in the fraud scheme and was a major beneficiary of the proceeds, despite his claims of non-involvement. The court also noted the risk of absconding given the co-accused's flight and the serious nature of the offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts