Mo Salim Ibarat authorized holder Asif Abdulkalam Chaudhary vs State of Maharashtra Through Mahalunge MIDC Police Station — 108/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 02nd April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHPU230011002026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
1100/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
108/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Civil Court,Khed
Judge
9-3rd JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
119
Police Station
MAHALUNGE M.I.D.C POLICE STATION
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mo Salim Ibarat authorized holder Asif Abdulkalam Chaudhary
Adv. HONRAO GANESH MADHUKAR
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Mahalunge MIDC Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 9-3rd JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Disposed
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 31-03-2026 | Unready Board | |
| 30-03-2026 | Unready Board | |
| 10-03-2026 | Unready Board | |
| 07-03-2026 | Unready Board |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted the applicant's petition for interim custody of a seized Ashok Leyland vehicle, finding that the registered owner had provided adequate documentation and was willing to comply with conditions. The release was ordered subject to a Rs. 10 lakh indemnity bond and strict conditions including non-sale, non-alteration, court production when required, and prohibition on criminal use, citing Supreme Court precedent that release of seized vehicles is desirable when properly safeguarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court granted the applicant's petition for interim custody of a seized Ashok Leyland vehicle, finding that the registered owner had provided adequate documentation and was willing to comply with conditions. The release was ordered subject to a Rs. 10 lakh indemnity bond and strict conditions including non-sale, non-alteration, court production when required, and prohibition on criminal use, citing Supreme Court precedent that release of seized vehicles is desirable when properly safeguarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts