Mo Salim Ibarat authorized holder Asif Abdulkalam Chaudhary vs State of Maharashtra Through Mahalunge MIDC Police Station — 108/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 02nd April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHPU230011002026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

1100/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

108/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

Civil Court,Khed

Judge

9-3rd JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. and J.M.F.C.

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

119

Police Station

MAHALUNGE M.I.D.C POLICE STATION

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Mo Salim Ibarat authorized holder Asif Abdulkalam Chaudhary

Adv. HONRAO GANESH MADHUKAR

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Mahalunge MIDC Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 9-3rd JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. and J.M.F.C.

02-04-2026

Disposed

31-03-2026

Unready Board

30-03-2026

Unready Board

10-03-2026

Unready Board

07-03-2026

Unready Board

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court granted the applicant's petition for interim custody of a seized Ashok Leyland vehicle, finding that the registered owner had provided adequate documentation and was willing to comply with conditions. The release was ordered subject to a Rs. 10 lakh indemnity bond and strict conditions including non-sale, non-alteration, court production when required, and prohibition on criminal use, citing Supreme Court precedent that release of seized vehicles is desirable when properly safeguarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the applicant's petition for interim custody of a seized Ashok Leyland vehicle, finding that the registered owner had provided adequate documentation and was willing to comply with conditions. The release was ordered subject to a Rs. 10 lakh indemnity bond and strict conditions including non-sale, non-alteration, court production when required, and prohibition on criminal use, citing Supreme Court precedent that release of seized vehicles is desirable when properly safeguarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court,Khed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case