Rani Simon Rathod vs State of Maharashtra Through Excise Police Station — 104/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 30th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHPU230010962026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

1096/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

104/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

Civil Court,Khed

Judge

9-3rd JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. and J.M.F.C.

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

57

Police Station

KHED POLICE STATION

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Rani Simon Rathod

Adv. HONRAO GANESH MADHUKAR

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Excise Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 9-3rd JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. and J.M.F.C.

30-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Unready Board

07-03-2026

Unready Board

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed the application of Rani Simon Rathod for interim custody of her seized Suzuki motorcycle (MH-14 NA-4517) under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court held that since the applicant is the registered owner, no confiscation proceedings have been initiated, and she agreed to comply with conditions, detaining the vehicle at the police station was unjustified. The motorcycle was released on an indemnity bond of ₹1,05,000 with conditions that she not sell/alter it, not use it for any crime, and produce it in court as required, relying on Supreme Court precedent favoring release of seized vehicles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the application of Rani Simon Rathod for interim custody of her seized Suzuki motorcycle (MH-14 NA-4517) under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court held that since the applicant is the registered owner, no confiscation proceedings have been initiated, and she agreed to comply with conditions, detaining the vehicle at the police station was unjustified. The motorcycle was released on an indemnity bond of ₹1,05,000 with conditions that she not sell/alter it, not use it for any crime, and produce it in court as required, relying on Supreme Court precedent favoring release of seized vehicles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court,Khed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case