Rani Simon Rathod vs State of Maharashtra Through Excise Police Station — 104/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 30th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHPU230010962026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
1096/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
104/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Civil Court,Khed
Judge
9-3rd JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
57
Police Station
KHED POLICE STATION
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rani Simon Rathod
Adv. HONRAO GANESH MADHUKAR
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Excise Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 9-3rd JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Disposed
Unready Board
Unready Board
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Unready Board | |
| 07-03-2026 | Unready Board |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court allowed the application of Rani Simon Rathod for interim custody of her seized Suzuki motorcycle (MH-14 NA-4517) under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court held that since the applicant is the registered owner, no confiscation proceedings have been initiated, and she agreed to comply with conditions, detaining the vehicle at the police station was unjustified. The motorcycle was released on an indemnity bond of ₹1,05,000 with conditions that she not sell/alter it, not use it for any crime, and produce it in court as required, relying on Supreme Court precedent favoring release of seized vehicles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the application of Rani Simon Rathod for interim custody of her seized Suzuki motorcycle (MH-14 NA-4517) under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court held that since the applicant is the registered owner, no confiscation proceedings have been initiated, and she agreed to comply with conditions, detaining the vehicle at the police station was unjustified. The motorcycle was released on an indemnity bond of ₹1,05,000 with conditions that she not sell/alter it, not use it for any crime, and produce it in court as required, relying on Supreme Court precedent favoring release of seized vehicles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts