Rani Simon Rathod vs State of Maharashtra Through Excise Police Station — 104/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 30th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHPU230010962026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
1096/2026
Filing Date
04-Mar-2026
Registration No
104/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court,Khed
Judge
9-3rd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
57
Police Station
KHED POLICE STATION
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rani Simon Rathod
Adv. HONRAO GANESH MADHUKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through Excise Police Station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court allowed the application of Rani Simon Rathod for interim custody of her seized Suzuki motorcycle (MH-14 NA-4517) under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court held that since the applicant is the registered owner, no confiscation proceedings have been initiated, and she agreed to comply with conditions, detaining the vehicle at the police station was unjustified. The motorcycle was released on an indemnity bond of ₹1,05,000 with conditions that she not sell/alter it, not use it for any crime, and produce it in court as required, relying on Supreme Court precedent favoring release of seized vehicles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.
-
10-Mar-2026
Unready Board
3rd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.
-
07-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 104/2026
Summary: The court allowed the application of Rani Simon Rathod for interim custody of her seized Suzuki motorcycle (MH-14 NA-4517) under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court held that since the applicant is the registered owner, no confiscation proceedings have been initiated, and she agreed to comply with conditions, detaining the vehicle at the police station was unjustified. The motorcycle was released on an indemnity bond of ₹1,05,000 with conditions that she not sell/alter it, not use it for any crime, and produce it in court as required, relying on Supreme Court precedent favoring release of seized vehicles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts