State of Maharashtra Chakan Police Station vs Ramdas Murlidhar Medankar and others — 10/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420, 354, 383,324, 504,506,509,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
Atro.Spl.Case - Special Case under Prevention of Atrocities Act
CNR: MHPU210018082019
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
846/2019
Filing Date
11-11-2019
Registration No
10/2019
Registration Date
13-11-2019
Court
Additional District Court, Khed
Judge
1-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, KHED - RAJGURUNAGAR
FIR Details
FIR Number
470
Police Station
CHAKAN POLICE STATION
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Chakan Police Station
Adv. app
Respondent(s)
Ramdas Murlidhar Medankar and others
Sanket Ramdas Medankar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, KHED - RAJGURUNAGAR
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 22-12-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the complainant Priyanka Zombade's application seeking withdrawal of Rs. 6,20,000 deposited by the accused during anticipatory bail proceedings before the High Court. The court held that since the trial is yet to be concluded and the case is at the charge-framing stage, it is premature to release the amount to the complainant. The deposited amount, with accrued interest, will be transferred to the proper party after final disposal of the case in accordance with the High Court's orders dated 27/01/2020 and 05/03/2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the complainant Priyanka Zombade's application seeking withdrawal of Rs. 6,20,000 deposited by the accused during anticipatory bail proceedings before the High Court. The court held that since the trial is yet to be concluded and the case is at the charge-framing stage, it is premature to release the amount to the complainant. The deposited amount, with accrued interest, will be transferred to the proper party after final disposal of the case in accordance with the High Court's orders dated 27/01/2020 and 05/03/2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts