Balu Laxman Wagh vs The State of Maharashtra Through Ghodegaon Police Station — 102/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 20th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHPU210002532026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
174/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
102/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
Additional District Court, Khed
Judge
1-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, KHED - RAJGURUNAGAR
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
216
Police Station
GHODEGAON POLICE STATION
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balu Laxman Wagh
Adv. KALE VAIBHAV RAJENDRA
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Ghodegaon Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, KHED - RAJGURUNAGAR
Disposed
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 10-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 07-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Khed-Rajgurunagar, Pune granted anticipatory bail to Balu Laxman Wagh in a 2021 case involving illegal manufacture and sale of country-made liquor under IPC sections 328, 34, Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Environment Protection Act, and other statutes. The court found that since investigation was completed, charge-sheet filed, the 60-year-old applicant had no prior criminal record, and police made no strong case for custodial interrogation, bail could be granted subject to conditions including a Rs. 25,000 PR bond, court appearance, and prohibition against tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Khed-Rajgurunagar, Pune granted anticipatory bail to Balu Laxman Wagh in a 2021 case involving illegal manufacture and sale of country-made liquor under IPC sections 328, 34, Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Environment Protection Act, and other statutes. The court found that since investigation was completed, charge-sheet filed, the 60-year-old applicant had no prior criminal record, and police made no strong case for custodial interrogation, bail could be granted subject to conditions including a Rs. 25,000 PR bond, court appearance, and prohibition against tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts