Kaluram Jijaba Daundkar vs Shantaram Kanhu Daundkar Advocate - Gate Yuvraj Govind — 1/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 09-Apr-2026 this date has passed

M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal

CNR: MHPU210000092026

e-Filing Number

06-01-2026

Filing Number

7/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

06-Jan-2026

Court

Additional District Court, Khed

Judge

1-District Judge - 1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Khed - Rajgurunagar

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 43

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kaluram Jijaba Daundkar

    Adv. Ingale Nilesh Prakash

  2. 2.Tanhaji Kaluram Daundkar

    Adv. INGALE NILESH PRAKASH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shantaram Kanhu Daundkar Advocate - Gate Yuvraj Govind

  2. 2.Tahasildar khed

  3. 3.Sub Divisional Officer Khed

  4. 4.Collector Pune

Case History

  1. 09-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge - 1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Khed - Rajgurunagar

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The application for appointment of a court commissioner was rejected and dismissed as not maintainable. The District Judge held that since an identical application was already pending before the trial court, the appellate court could not entertain the matter, as Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC applies to suits requiring local investigation. However, the court directed the trial court to expeditiously dispose of the pending application regarding the disputed road access. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge - 1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Khed - Rajgurunagar

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Order

    District Judge - 1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Khed - Rajgurunagar

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Order

    District Judge - 1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Khed - Rajgurunagar

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge - 1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Khed - Rajgurunagar

  9. 05-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge - 1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Khed - Rajgurunagar

  10. 02-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge - 1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Khed - Rajgurunagar

  11. 17-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge - 1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Khed - Rajgurunagar

  12. 08-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge - 1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Khed - Rajgurunagar

  13. 07-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The application for appointment of a court commissioner was rejected and dismissed as not maintainable. The District Judge held that since an identical application was already pending before the trial court, the appellate court could not entertain the matter, as Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC applies to suits requiring local investigation. However, the court directed the trial court to expeditiously dispose of the pending application regarding the disputed road access. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case