Kaluram Jijaba Daundkar vs Shantaram Kanhu Daundkar Advocate - Gate Yuvraj Govind — 1/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal
CNR: MHPU210000092026
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
06-01-2026
Filing Number
7/2026
Filing Date
06-01-2026
Registration No
1/2026
Registration Date
06-01-2026
Court
Additional District Court, Khed
Judge
1-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, KHED - RAJGURUNAGAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kaluram Jijaba Daundkar
Adv. Ingale Nilesh Prakash
Tanhaji Kaluram Daundkar
Adv. INGALE NILESH PRAKASH
Respondent(s)
Shantaram Kanhu Daundkar Advocate - Gate Yuvraj Govind
Tahasildar khed
Sub Divisional Officer Khed
Collector Pune
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, KHED - RAJGURUNAGAR
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Order
Order
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 27-02-2026 | Order | |
| 23-02-2026 | Order | |
| 13-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
Interim Orders
The application for appointment of a court commissioner was rejected and dismissed as not maintainable. The District Judge held that since an identical application was already pending before the trial court, the appellate court could not entertain the matter, as Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC applies to suits requiring local investigation. However, the court directed the trial court to expeditiously dispose of the pending application regarding the disputed road access. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The application for appointment of a court commissioner was rejected and dismissed as not maintainable. The District Judge held that since an identical application was already pending before the trial court, the appellate court could not entertain the matter, as Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC applies to suits requiring local investigation. However, the court directed the trial court to expeditiously dispose of the pending application regarding the disputed road access. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts