Kaluram Jijaba Daundkar vs Shantaram Kanhu Daundkar Advocate - Gate Yuvraj Govind — 1/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal

CNR: MHPU210000092026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

e-Filing Number

06-01-2026

Filing Number

7/2026

Filing Date

06-01-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

06-01-2026

Court

Additional District Court, Khed

Judge

1-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, KHED - RAJGURUNAGAR

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 43

Petitioner(s)

Kaluram Jijaba Daundkar

Adv. Ingale Nilesh Prakash

Tanhaji Kaluram Daundkar

Adv. INGALE NILESH PRAKASH

Respondent(s)

Shantaram Kanhu Daundkar Advocate - Gate Yuvraj Govind

Tahasildar khed

Sub Divisional Officer Khed

Collector Pune

Hearing History

Judge: 1-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, KHED - RAJGURUNAGAR

25-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

07-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

27-02-2026

Order

23-02-2026

Order

13-02-2026

Reply/Say

Interim Orders

07-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The application for appointment of a court commissioner was rejected and dismissed as not maintainable. The District Judge held that since an identical application was already pending before the trial court, the appellate court could not entertain the matter, as Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC applies to suits requiring local investigation. However, the court directed the trial court to expeditiously dispose of the pending application regarding the disputed road access. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The application for appointment of a court commissioner was rejected and dismissed as not maintainable. The District Judge held that since an identical application was already pending before the trial court, the appellate court could not entertain the matter, as Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC applies to suits requiring local investigation. However, the court directed the trial court to expeditiously dispose of the pending application regarding the disputed road access. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District Court, Khed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case