The State of Maharashtra Forest Area Shirur vs Somnath Sahebrao Darekar — 543/2025
Case under Indian Forest Act Section 26(1). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU200013182025
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1010/2025
Filing Date
24-04-2025
Registration No
543/2025
Registration Date
24-04-2025
Court
Civil Court,Shirur
Judge
2-2nd Joint C.J.J.D and J. M. F. C Ghodnadi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Forest Area Shirur
Respondent(s)
Somnath Sahebrao Darekar
Harshraj Kaluram Darekar
Kuldip Ashokrao Mohod
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Joint C.J.J.D and J. M. F. C Ghodnadi
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 27-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: S.B.F.K. 543/2025 Court: First Class Magistrate, Ghodindi, Shirud, Pune District The court dismissed the petition filed by the accused's advocate. The accused's statement regarding the panchnama (official record) and the circumstances of the case was found unconvincing by the court. The court held that the panchnama was valid and properly executed, rejecting the accused's contentions that he only signed to correct errors or that he was not informed of the details contained therein. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: S.B.F.K. 543/2025 Court: First Class Magistrate, Ghodindi, Shirud, Pune District The court dismissed the petition filed by the accused's advocate. The accused's statement regarding the panchnama (official record) and the circumstances of the case was found unconvincing by the court. The court held that the panchnama was valid and properly executed, rejecting the accused's contentions that he only signed to correct errors or that he was not informed of the details contained therein. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts