Aniket Vikas Kamble vs Vikas Gangadhar Kamble — 498/2023
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 8. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU180035202023
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
23-11-2023
Filing Number
694/2023
Filing Date
28-11-2023
Registration No
498/2023
Registration Date
02-12-2023
Court
Civil Court,Daund
Judge
15-2nd JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. DAUND
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Aniket Vikas Kamble
Adv. Shinde Rajendra Dadaram
Respondent(s)
Vikas Gangadhar Kamble
Shalini Gangadhar Kamble
Adv. Gund Shrikant Sampatrao
Padmakar Gangadhar Kamble
Adv. Gund Shrikant Sampatrao
Hearing History
Judge: 15-2nd JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. DAUND
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 16-02-2026 | Steps | |
| 22-12-2025 | Steps | |
| 04-11-2025 | Steps | |
| 22-09-2025 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed the application of Defendants 2 and 3 with costs of Rs. 1,000, setting aside the previous ex-parte order passed against them on 25 June 2024 and permitting them to file their written submissions in a property dispute case. The court found their reasons for delay to be valid and held that they were entitled to opportunity to present their case before final judgment, as justice requires a hearing on the merits of the matter concerning immovable property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the application of Defendants 2 and 3 with costs of Rs. 1,000, setting aside the previous ex-parte order passed against them on 25 June 2024 and permitting them to file their written submissions in a property dispute case. The court found their reasons for delay to be valid and held that they were entitled to opportunity to present their case before final judgment, as justice requires a hearing on the merits of the matter concerning immovable property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts