Yash Hemant Nimhan Through Next Friend Shankarrao Eknath Nimhan vs Yashwant Shankarrao Nimhan — 462/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 11th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU180032212023
Next Hearing
11th April 2026
e-Filing Number
20-10-2023
Filing Number
641/2023
Filing Date
27-10-2023
Registration No
462/2023
Registration Date
04-11-2023
Court
Civil Court,Daund
Judge
1-5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yash Hemant Nimhan Through Next Friend Shankarrao Eknath Nimhan
Adv. PATIL KISHOR CHANDRAKANT
Siddhesh Hemant Nimhan Through Next Friend Shankarrao Eknath Nimhan
Respondent(s)
Yashwant Shankarrao Nimhan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 20-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 17-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 12-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary (RCS No. 462/2023) The defendant's application for rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(b) of the CPC has been rejected. The court found that the plaintiff correctly valued the suit as a declaration and injunction case under Section 6(iv)(j) of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act, which requires court fees of Rs. 30/- for suits seeking declaration without monetary valuation. The plaint's averments were found to be germane and properly valued, hence the suit is not liable for rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary (RCS No. 462/2023) The defendant's application for rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(b) of the CPC has been rejected. The court found that the plaintiff correctly valued the suit as a declaration and injunction case under Section 6(iv)(j) of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act, which requires court fees of Rs. 30/- for suits seeking declaration without monetary valuation. The plaint's averments were found to be germane and properly valued, hence the suit is not liable for rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts