State Of Maharashtra - Yavat Police Station vs Tanaji Rajaram Shinde — 609/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,452,504,506. Status: Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU180029192023
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2379/2023
Filing Date
07-10-2023
Registration No
609/2023
Registration Date
26-10-2023
Court
Civil Court,Daund
Judge
4-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D AND J.M.F.C. DAUND
FIR Details
FIR Number
230
Police Station
YEWAT POLICE STATION
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Maharashtra - Yavat Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Tanaji Rajaram Shinde
Hearing History
Judge: 4-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D AND J.M.F.C. DAUND
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 17-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 06-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary In this criminal case (FIR No. 609/2023, Pune District), the court examined testimony from a police inspector (witness for prosecution) regarding an assault complaint filed by a woman against the accused. The court accepted the witness examination as complete and found the prosecution's case and documentary evidence (occurrence report and FIR) properly recorded with appropriate signatures. The cross-examination by the defense revealed no contradictions in the witness's testimony, and the court closed the evidentiary phase without requiring further examination, with the case remaining under Section 45 of the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this criminal case (FIR No. 609/2023, Pune District), the court examined testimony from a police inspector (witness for prosecution) regarding an assault complaint filed by a woman against the accused. The court accepted the witness examination as complete and found the prosecution's case and documentary evidence (occurrence report and FIR) properly recorded with appropriate signatures. The cross-examination by the defense revealed no contradictions in the witness's testimony, and the court closed the evidentiary phase without requiring further examination, with the case remaining under Section 45 of the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts