Sanjyot Suraj SonwaneRepresented by Guardian -Ashwini Suraj Sonawane vs Suraj Ambar Sonwane Advocate - Shinde Jeetsankalp Maruti — 486/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU180025192022
Filing Number
730/2022
Filing Date
16-Nov-2022
Registration No
486/2022
Registration Date
09-Dec-2022
Court
Civil Court,Daund
Judge
1-5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sanjyot Suraj SonwaneRepresented by Guardian -Ashwini Suraj Sonawane
Adv. Gunjal Prasad Shivaji
-
2.Shatakashi Suraj SonawaneRepresented by Guardian - Ashwini Suraj Sonawane
-
3.Ashwini Suraj Sonawane
Respondent(s)
-
1.Suraj Ambar Sonwane Advocate - Shinde Jeetsankalp Maruti
-
2.Mukund Balwant Ghugre on behalf of Cement Company Pvt. Ltd. Patas
-
3.Zumbar Janaba Sonawane
-
4.Mangal Ambar Sonawane
-
5.Madhavi Santosh Gujar
Case History
-
18-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
31-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
03-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
29-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
16-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
30-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
21-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
07-May-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
SUMMARY: The court rejected the defendants' application seeking rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court found that the plaintiffs had paid proper court fees for their claims of partition, declaration, and injunction, and that valuation and jurisdiction issues could be addressed during issue-framing. The court also held that non-joinder of necessary parties is not grounds for plaint rejection and that the plaint averments were germane to the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
05-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
21-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
01-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
01-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
21-Jan-2025
Unready Board
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
16-Nov-2024
Unready Board
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
19-Oct-2024
Unready Board
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
31-Aug-2024
Unready Board
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
03-Aug-2024
Unready Board
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
20-Jul-2024
Unready Board
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
29-Jun-2024
Unready Board
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
20-Apr-2024
Unready Board
3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund
-
02-Mar-2024
Unready Board
3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund
-
17-Feb-2024
Unready Board
3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund
-
20-Jan-2024
Unready Board
3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund
-
16-Dec-2023
Unready Board
-
22-Nov-2023
Unready Board
-
04-Oct-2023
Unready Board
-
16-Sep-2023
Unready Board
-
19-Aug-2023
Unready Board
-
15-Jul-2023
Unready Board
-
06-May-2023
Unready Board
-
12-Apr-2023
Unready Board
-
04-Mar-2023
Unready Board
-
20-Jan-2023
Unready Board
-
09-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 486/2022
SUMMARY: The court rejected the defendants' application seeking rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court found that the plaintiffs had paid proper court fees for their claims of partition, declaration, and injunction, and that valuation and jurisdiction issues could be addressed during issue-framing. The court also held that non-joinder of necessary parties is not grounds for plaint rejection and that the plaint averments were germane to the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts