Vitthal Dinkar Jadhav vs Kusum Jaysing Jadhav — 370/2023
Case under Partition Act Section 6. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 27th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU180023672023
e-Filing Number
04-09-2023
Filing Number
528/2023
Filing Date
05-09-2023
Registration No
370/2023
Registration Date
06-09-2023
Court
Civil Court,Daund
Judge
4-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D AND J.M.F.C. DAUND
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vitthal Dinkar Jadhav
Adv. Fadtare Uday Dharmajirao
Respondent(s)
Kusum Jaysing Jadhav
Sanjay Jaysing Jadhav
Santosh Jaysing Jadhav
Sampat Jaysing Jadhav
Shobha Rohidas Shitole
Hearing History
Judge: 4-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D AND J.M.F.C. DAUND
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 03-02-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 06-01-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 04-11-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the suit filed by Vitthal against Kusum and others for default of the plaintiff under Order 9 Rule 5 of the CPC. The plaintiff and his advocate were repeatedly absent during proceedings, and the suit had remained pending without progress for more than two years, demonstrating lack of diligence in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court dismissed the suit filed by Vitthal against Kusum and others for default of the plaintiff under Order 9 Rule 5 of the CPC. The plaintiff and his advocate were repeatedly absent during proceedings, and the suit had remained pending without progress for more than two years, demonstrating lack of diligence in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts