Vitthal Dinkar Jadhav vs Kusum Jaysing Jadhav — 370/2023

Case under Partition Act Section 6. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHPU180023672023

e-Filing Number

04-09-2023

Filing Number

528/2023

Filing Date

05-Sep-2023

Registration No

370/2023

Registration Date

06-Sep-2023

Court

Civil Court,Daund

Judge

4-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Partition Act Section 6
Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vitthal Dinkar Jadhav

    Adv. Fadtare Uday Dharmajirao

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kusum Jaysing Jadhav

  2. 2.Sanjay Jaysing Jadhav

  3. 3.Santosh Jaysing Jadhav

  4. 4.Sampat Jaysing Jadhav

  5. 5.Shobha Rohidas Shitole

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed the suit filed by Vitthal against Kusum and others for default of the plaintiff under Order 9 Rule 5 of the CPC. The plaintiff and his advocate were repeatedly absent during proceedings, and the suit had remained pending without progress for more than two years, demonstrating lack of diligence in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Dismissal Order

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Dismissal Order

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    Dismissal Order

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  8. 04-Nov-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  9. 13-Sep-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  10. 26-Aug-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  11. 23-Jul-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  12. 17-Jun-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  13. 20-Mar-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  14. 13-Feb-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  15. 14-Dec-2024

    Steps_Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  16. 18-Nov-2024

    Steps_Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  17. 28-Sep-2024

    Steps_Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  18. 03-Sep-2024

    Steps_Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  19. 25-Jul-2024

    Steps_Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  20. 02-May-2024

    Steps_Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  21. 20-Mar-2024

    Unready Board

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  22. 01-Feb-2024

    Unready Board

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  23. 04-Dec-2023

    Unready Board

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Daund

  24. 12-Oct-2023

    Unready Board

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Daund

  25. 09-Sep-2023

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Daund

  26. 08-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 05-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 370/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the suit filed by Vitthal against Kusum and others for default of the plaintiff under Order 9 Rule 5 of the CPC. The plaintiff and his advocate were repeatedly absent during proceedings, and the suit had remained pending without progress for more than two years, demonstrating lack of diligence in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case