State Of Maharashtra - Yavat Police Station vs Prashant Ramdas Gaikwad Advocate - Phadke Anil Pralhad — 780/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,427. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHPU180021932018

Filing Number

1651/2018

Filing Date

06-Oct-2018

Registration No

780/2018

Registration Date

17-Oct-2018

Court

Civil Court,Daund

Judge

5-3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

688

Police Station

YEWAT POLICE STATION

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,427
Motor Vehicles Act Section 184,39,192

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra - Yavat Police Station

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prashant Ramdas Gaikwad Advocate - Phadke Anil Pralhad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court acquitted the defendant Prashant Ramdas Gayakwad of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338, 427 and Motor Vehicle Act sections 184, 39/192, finding insufficient evidence to prove the motor vehicle accident case beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant's testimony was completely unreliable and contradicted the prosecution's case, and no corroborating physical evidence was presented to establish the defendant's culpability in the alleged accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund

  7. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund

  8. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund

  9. 31-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund

  10. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund

  11. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund

  12. 01-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund

  13. 30-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund

  14. 02-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  15. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  16. 19-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  17. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  18. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  19. 19-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  20. 14-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  21. 03-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  22. 29-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  23. 25-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  24. 25-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  25. 18-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  26. 01-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  27. 30-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  28. 05-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  29. 25-Oct-2023

    Charge

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  30. 18-Aug-2023

    Charge

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  31. 10-Jul-2023

    Charge

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  32. 02-May-2023

    Charge

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  33. 17-Feb-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  34. 09-Dec-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  35. 11-Oct-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  36. 17-Aug-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  37. 17-May-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  38. 17-Mar-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  39. 06-Jan-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  40. 12-Oct-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  41. 12-Jul-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  42. 04-May-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  43. 05-Feb-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  44. 07-Nov-2020

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  45. 22-Jul-2020

    Unready Board

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  46. 20-May-2020

    Unready Board

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  47. 27-Feb-2020

    Unready Board

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  48. 18-Jan-2020

    Unready Board

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  49. 06-Nov-2019

    Unready Board

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund

  50. 28-Aug-2019

    Unready Board

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund

  51. 25-Jun-2019

    Unready Board

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund

  52. 29-Apr-2019

    Unready Board

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund

  53. 12-Feb-2019

    Unready Board

    3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund

  54. 14-Dec-2018

    Unready Board

    2nd Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Daund

  55. 19-Oct-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 06-Oct-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 780/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the defendant Prashant Ramdas Gayakwad of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338, 427 and Motor Vehicle Act sections 184, 39/192, finding insufficient evidence to prove the motor vehicle accident case beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant's testimony was completely unreliable and contradicted the prosecution's case, and no corroborating physical evidence was presented to establish the defendant's culpability in the alleged accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case