Pallavi Naim Chavan vs Nanda Tukaram Chavan — 317/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Unready Board. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU180021572023
e-Filing Number
16-08-2023
Filing Number
465/2023
Filing Date
18-Aug-2023
Registration No
317/2023
Registration Date
24-Aug-2023
Court
Civil Court,Daund
Judge
1-5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pallavi Naim Chavan
Adv. FADTARE UDAY D
-
2.Mohini Kunal Chavan
Adv. FADTARE UDAY D
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nanda Tukaram Chavan
-
2.Sanjay Bhikaji Jadhav
Case History
-
29-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Unready Board
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
28-Jan-2026
Unready Board
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
17-Dec-2025
Unready Board
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
14-Nov-2025
Unready Board
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
01-Oct-2025
Unready Board
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
20-Aug-2025
Unready Board
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
23-Jul-2025
Unready Board
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
21-Jun-2025
Unready Board
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
15-Apr-2025
Issues
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
18-Feb-2025
Issues
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
04-Jan-2025
Issues
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
19-Oct-2024
Issues
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
13-Aug-2024
Issues
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
02-Jul-2024
Issues
5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
-
18-Apr-2024
Issues
3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund
-
07-Mar-2024
Issues
3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund
-
03-Feb-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary Pallavi v/s Nanda (R.C.S. 317/2023) — The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction restraining the defendant from obstructing possession of agricultural property and harvesting sugarcane. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, prove balance of convenience, or demonstrate irreparable loss, as the defendant's possession is supported by a probate certificate and revenue records while the plaintiff relied solely on a possession receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Feb-2024
Unready Board
3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund
-
31-Jan-2024
Unready Board
3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund
-
22-Jan-2024
Reply Unready
3rd Joint Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Daund
-
16-Jan-2024
Reply Unready
-
09-Jan-2024
Reply Unready
-
21-Dec-2023
Reply Unready
-
14-Dec-2023
Reply Unready
-
09-Nov-2023
W.S. and Say
-
09-Oct-2023
Appearance
-
16-Sep-2023
Unready Board
-
24-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 317/2023
Case Summary Pallavi v/s Nanda (R.C.S. 317/2023) — The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction restraining the defendant from obstructing possession of agricultural property and harvesting sugarcane. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, prove balance of convenience, or demonstrate irreparable loss, as the defendant's possession is supported by a probate certificate and revenue records while the plaintiff relied solely on a possession receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts