Daund Sugar Pra Ltd Company Alegaon Through Rahul Sadashiv Atole vs Janardan Ashruba Ubale — 835/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU180016802025
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
e-Filing Number
15-07-2025
Filing Number
1680/2025
Filing Date
19-07-2025
Registration No
835/2025
Registration Date
21-07-2025
Court
Civil Court,Daund
Judge
1-5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Daund Sugar Pra Ltd Company Alegaon Through Rahul Sadashiv Atole
Adv. BODKHE RAJENDRA RAGHUNATH
Respondent(s)
Janardan Ashruba Ubale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-5th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 07-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 21-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 03-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 20-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Summary: The JMFC Court at Daund, Pune issued process against the accused Janardan Ashruba Ubale under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on 29th July 2025. The court found prima facie evidence of the offence from documents and the complainant's verification affidavit, and restricted the inquiry to document examination based on the Bombay High Court's latest circular, dispensing with the need for a full Section 202 inquiry despite the accused residing outside the court's territorial jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The JMFC Court at Daund, Pune issued process against the accused Janardan Ashruba Ubale under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on 29th July 2025. The court found prima facie evidence of the offence from documents and the complainant's verification affidavit, and restricted the inquiry to document examination based on the Bombay High Court's latest circular, dispensing with the need for a full Section 202 inquiry despite the accused residing outside the court's territorial jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts