VIJAY JALINDAR ZAGADE vs Inspector, State of Excise Department, Daund — 52/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHPU180004822026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
482/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
52/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Civil Court,Daund
Judge
10-4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
11
Police Station
DAUND POLICE STATION
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIJAY JALINDAR ZAGADE
Adv. Mane Rohan Shivaji
Respondent(s)
Inspector, State of Excise Department, Daund
Hearing History
Judge: 10-4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 11-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed Vijay Zagade's application under Section 503 BNSS to recover his seized iPhone 15, finding he had proven ownership through bills and Aadhar card and that the mobile was not material evidence for further investigation. The court granted interim custody upon execution of a ₹90,000 indemnity bond, subject to conditions that he not transfer the device, use it criminally, or modify it, and must produce it as required by investigating authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court allowed Vijay Zagade's application under Section 503 BNSS to recover his seized iPhone 15, finding he had proven ownership through bills and Aadhar card and that the mobile was not material evidence for further investigation. The court granted interim custody upon execution of a ₹90,000 indemnity bond, subject to conditions that he not transfer the device, use it criminally, or modify it, and must produce it as required by investigating authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts