State Of Maharashtra - Yavat Police Station vs Ankush Lahu Kamble — 275/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHPU180004652026

Filing Number

465/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

275/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court,Daund

Judge

15-2nd Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Daund

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

96

Police Station

YEWAT POLICE STATION

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra - Yavat Police Station

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ankush Lahu Kamble

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court convicted Ankush Lahu Kamble for obstructing a public way by illegally parking his vehicle on a road in Daund, Pune, under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 500 with a two-day simple imprisonment in default, with the magistrate considering leniency due to his status as the sole family breadwinner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Daund

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Daund

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 275/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Ankush Lahu Kamble for obstructing a public way by illegally parking his vehicle on a road in Daund, Pune, under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 500 with a two-day simple imprisonment in default, with the magistrate considering leniency due to his status as the sole family breadwinner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case