State Of Maharashtra - Yavat Police Station vs Pranav Prakash Bhandari — 272/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHPU180004622026

Filing Number

462/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

272/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court,Daund

Judge

10-4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

159

Police Station

YEWAT POLICE STATION

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra - Yavat Police Station

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pranav Prakash Bhandari

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The Judicial Magistrate convicted Pranav Prakash Bhandari for causing disturbance to the public on 16/02/2026 under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily to the charge of parking his rickshaw on a public road causing public disturbance. Considering his poor financial condition and status as the sole breadwinner, the court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-, with simple imprisonment for two days in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Joint C J J D And J M F C Daund

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 272/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate convicted Pranav Prakash Bhandari for causing disturbance to the public on 16/02/2026 under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily to the charge of parking his rickshaw on a public road causing public disturbance. Considering his poor financial condition and status as the sole breadwinner, the court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-, with simple imprisonment for two days in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case